Motion vault

RESEARCH RESOURCE: Not reviewed or approved as a filing-ready motion.

Jurisdiction: Federal constitutional law

Document type: Supreme Court opinion

Potential use: Undisclosed impeachment and medical records assessed cumulatively; Brady relief granted; IAC issue not decided.

Limitations: Use current destination-court rules and case-specific procedural history. Forms are blank; opinions and briefs are research, not filing-ready motions.

RESEARCH RESOURCE: Not reviewed or approved as a filing-ready motion.

Jurisdiction: United States Supreme Court

Document type: counseled filed brief

Potential use: Argument structure and authorities on requested appeals; not pro se and not a habeas petition.

Limitations: Use current destination-court rules and case-specific procedural history. Forms are blank; opinions and briefs are research, not filing-ready motions.

RESEARCH RESOURCE: Not reviewed or approved as a filing-ready motion.

Jurisdiction: Federal constitutional law

Document type: Supreme Court opinion

Potential use: Analyze withheld evidence collectively against whole trial record; relief denied on materiality.

Limitations: Use current destination-court rules and case-specific procedural history. Forms are blank; opinions and briefs are research, not filing-ready motions.

RESEARCH RESOURCE: Not reviewed or approved as a filing-ready motion.

Jurisdiction: Georgia

Document type: court opinion

Potential use: Earliest practicable opportunity to raise trial IAC; new claims on appeal waived on this record.

Limitations: Use current destination-court rules and case-specific procedural history. Forms are blank; opinions and briefs are research, not filing-ready motions.

Original source: https://www.gasupreme.us/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/s25a0849.pdf

RESEARCH RESOURCE: Not reviewed or approved as a filing-ready motion.

Jurisdiction: Federal habeas

Document type: Supreme Court opinion

Potential use: Martinez exception does not extend to defaulted ineffective-assistance-of-appellate-counsel claims.

Limitations: Use current destination-court rules and case-specific procedural history. Forms are blank; opinions and briefs are research, not filing-ready motions.

RESEARCH RESOURCE: Not reviewed or approved as a filing-ready motion.

Jurisdiction: Federal constitutional law

Document type: Supreme Court opinion

Potential use: Failure to file a requested notice of appeal; presumption of prejudice despite appeal waiver.

Limitations: Use current destination-court rules and case-specific procedural history. Forms are blank; opinions and briefs are research, not filing-ready motions.

RESEARCH RESOURCE: Not reviewed or approved as a filing-ready motion.

Jurisdiction: Federal sentencing court

Document type: official motion form

Potential use: Federal conviction or sentence challenge; IAC and Brady grounds where procedurally available.

Limitations: Use current destination-court rules and case-specific procedural history. Forms are blank; opinions and briefs are research, not filing-ready motions.

RESEARCH RESOURCE: Not reviewed or approved as a filing-ready motion.

Jurisdiction: Federal review of state custody

Document type: official petition form

Potential use: Ground-by-ground facts, exhaustion, procedural history, timeliness and signature.

Limitations: Use current destination-court rules and case-specific procedural history. Forms are blank; opinions and briefs are research, not filing-ready motions.

RESEARCH RESOURCE: Not reviewed or approved as a filing-ready motion.

Jurisdiction: Georgia state habeas

Document type: official petition form

Potential use: State conviction challenge; supporting facts, prior proceedings, verification.

Limitations: Use current destination-court rules and case-specific procedural history. Forms are blank; opinions and briefs are research, not filing-ready motions.

RESEARCH RESOURCE: Not reviewed or approved as a filing-ready motion.

Jurisdiction: Eleventh Circuit; unpublished

Document type: court opinion

Potential use: Deadline triage for newly discovered evidence and successive new-trial motions; preserve actual diligence facts and distinguish Rule 33 from habeas. Unpublished, not binding precedent.

Limitations: Initial issue-specific screening, not a citator certification. Verify subsequent history, exact holding, governing statutory law and application to the client.